Report: Amazon could split its HQ2 between 2 cities |

Report: Amazon could split its HQ2 between 2 cities

An Amazon delivery van.

Amazon could split its HQ2 between two cities , The Wall Street Journal reported Monday.

Citing an anonymous source familiar with Amazon’s plans, the highly-sought-after second headquarters will go to two cities in order to recruit enough tech talent, according the report.

Both cities could get 25,000 employees, splitting in half the expected 50,000 employees HQ2 could bring.

A decision could come as soon as this week, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Amazon’s shortlist of potential second headquarter sites appeared to get smaller over the weekend. The Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon was in final talks with New York, Dallas and Crystal City, Virginia, which is just outside of Washington. The Washington Post reported that Amazon was looking at real estate in Crystal City for its second headquarters.

Amazon has not confirmed either report. The company declined to comment on the Wall Street Journal’s story.

Mike Grella, Amazon’s director of Economic Development Public Policy tweeted Saturday that leaks pointing toward Crystal City as the HQ2 selection wasn’t doing the city any favors.

“And stop treating the NDA you signed like a used napkin,” Grella tweeted.

Officials in Amazon’s final 20 for HQ2, including Pittsburgh, were required to sign non-disclosure agreements barring them from talking about the process to the media. Pittsburgh officials have been extremely quiet about Amazon, discussions with the company and the company’s visit to the city.

A judge ruled last week that Pittsburgh and Allegheny County must make public in 30 days the bid submitted to Amazon for HQ2. Both the city and county plan to appeal that decision.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Aaron at 412-336-8448, [email protected] or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.