Revitalization money needed, state senators told by municipal officials |

Revitalization money needed, state senators told by municipal officials

Bob Bauder

Senators gearing for the state’s annual budget battle heard a recurring theme on Wednesday in Pittsburgh: Municipalities need money and legislative changes to ensure their survival.

Regional officials urged members of the Senate Urban Affairs and Housing Committee for changes to archaic pension laws and grant regulations. They asked for continued funding of programs that beautify downtowns, build affordable housing and spur development.

Sen. Jim Ferlo, D-Highland Park, said it is important to tell Republican leaders, who control the state’s purse strings, how budget cuts and changes in grant regulations stunt development programs.

House Republicans on Wednesday announced a $28.3 billion budget proposal that is about $600 million more than 2012, but $110 million less than what Gov. Tom Corbett proposed.

The hearing chaired by Sen. David Argall, R-Schuylkill, at the Allegheny County Courthouse was the first of three the committee plans to convene across the state.

“This has a direct impact on the formation of the budget,” said Ferlo, who testified as a board member of the Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority. “We’re all in the same boat, Republican or Democrat. We all have similar problems. I think they needed to better understand the significance of these programs and what they have done.”

Robert Rubinstein, the URA’s acting executive director, said state and federal funding cuts and changes in how state grants are awarded have stalled projects in Pittsburgh.

“At all levels, funding to support public infrastructure is harder to come by but the state’s core funding programs that we have used, to great effect in our neighborhoods, have been disproportionately disrupted,” he said.

Noticeably absent from the proceedings was Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, who repeatedly has called for state pension reform. Pittsburgh has $1 billion in future pension liabilities, about 40 percent of which is unfunded.

Ravenstahl spokeswoman Marissa Doyle said URA officials attended the hearing on the mayor’s behalf.

Councilman Bill Peduto, the Democratic nominee for mayor, asked the committee for changes in state law that would prevent employees from padding pensions by working overtime before they retire and to equalize a pension funding formula for municipalities.

Peduto said state law should require arbitrators to consider a city’s ability to pay before deciding awards in contract disputes.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.