Robert Bowers pleads not guilty in Tree of Life synagogue rampage |

Robert Bowers pleads not guilty in Tree of Life synagogue rampage

Megan Guza
Robert D. Bowers

Robert Bowers, the alleged gunman in a Saturday’s synagogue shooting that left 11 people dead, pleaded not guilty to all charges against him in federal court Thursday.

Bowers, 46, walked into the eighth-floor courtroom wearing a red jail jumpsuit and a large bandage on his upper left arm. He’d been brought to court in a wheelchair Monday.

His legs were shackled, and his hands were shackled to his wait. U.S. Marshals freed Bowers’s right hand for the duration of the court proceedings so he could sign paperwork.

He appeared more animated than his last court appearance, speaking quietly with his attorneys, Michal Novara and Elisa Long, as well as answering “yes” confidently to several questions posed by the judge and prosecutors Troy Rivetti and Soo C. Song.

Facing a 44-count indictment that includes nearly two dozen charges that are punishable by death, Bowers pleaded “not guilty” and requested a jury trial.

A grand jury alleged in its indictment that Bowers, of Baldwin, went to the Tree of Life in Squirrel Hill during Saturday morning services for three congregations and opened fire with an AR-15 and three handguns.

Eleven people were killed and six were injured. Four of the injured were police officers who exchanged fire with Bowers during multiple gun battles. Bowers was shot and injured. He was released from Allegheny General Hospital on Monday morning.

He remains in the custody of the U.S. Marshals, and he is being held in the Butler County Prison without bail.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.