Second rabid raccoon found in Pittsburgh’s Morningside area |

Second rabid raccoon found in Pittsburgh’s Morningside area

Emily Balser

A second raccoon found in the Morningside area of Pittsburgh has tested positive for rabies.

The Allegheny County Health Department confirmed Friday that a raccoon brought to one of its facilities on Thursday tested positive for the virus.

The raccoon was discovered near the 1500 block of Duffield Street near the Stanton Heights border. Another raccoon from that area tested positive for rabies earlier this week.

The health department warns residents to always avoid stray and wild animals even if they appear healthy.

Residents should immediately notify their local animal control service, the police or the Pennsylvania Game Commission if any animal appears to be acting strange or becomes threatening. Residents should also make sure their pets are up-to-date with vaccinations.

Rabies is transmitted by an animal bite or scratch. Exposures due to a bite or scratch are almost always fatal when left untreated.

Anyone who is bitten, scratched or otherwise exposed to saliva from an animal should immediately cleanse the contact area with soap and water, seek emergency medical treatment and call the Allegheny County Health Department at 412-687-2243 to report the incident.

In August, the county health department distributed rabies vaccine baits for raccoons across the county, focusing on wooded areas and parks. Made of fishmeal and fish oil, the bait attracts raccoons and has a packet of rabies vaccine in the middle.

This is the 20th rabid animal reported in Allegheny County in 2018 including nine raccoons, seven bats, two cats, one groundhog and one fox.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.