Archive

Senate GOP wants Democrat Lindsey Williams to prove she meets residency rule | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Senate GOP wants Democrat Lindsey Williams to prove she meets residency rule

The Associated Press
447320vnd38thSenatePreview7101818
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Lindsey Williams, candidate for State Senate, glances through her notes while walking door to door in Brackenridge on Thursday, Oct. 26, 2018.
447320VNDStateSenate2110718
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Lindsey Williams views the pole numbers Tuesday Nov 6, 2018. at the Operating Engineers Hall in RIDC Park and seeճ that she was won her home precinct in West View District 3.
447320VNDStateSenate8110718
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Lindsey Williams gives her thanks her supporters during her exception speech at the Operating Engineers Hall in RIDC Park. Tuesday Nov 6, 2018. Williams won against Jeremy Schaffer by 298 votes.
447320VNDStateSenate1110718
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Lindsey Williams views the pole numbers with Pa Political Director, Andi Perez, and Campaign Chair Person Ryan Morden, Tuesday Nov 6, 2018. at the Operating Engineers Hall in RIDC Park. Williams seeճ that she was won her home precinct in West View District 3.

HARRISBURG — Republicans who control Pennsylvania’s Senate want a Democrat who is the apparent winner in the race for an open suburban Pittsburgh seat to prove she meets the residency requirement to serve in the chamber, senators said Wednesday.

Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre, said Republicans plan to ask Democrat Lindsey Williams to show how she meets a constitutional requirement that newly elected senators must have lived in Pennsylvania for the prior four years.

“She needs to have the ability to come in and lay out that she does meet the requirements and, if she does, that’ll be the end of it,” Corman said. “If she doesn’t, then we’ve got an issue that we need to deal with.”

Corman would not say how Republicans will handle it if they decide that Williams doesn’t meet the requirement. Republican senators discussed the matter for the first time Wednesday during a closed-door caucus meeting.

A judge threw out a Republican-backed lawsuit last month challenging Williams’ eligibility, saying the plaintiffs had missed a seven-day period in March to challenge her nomination petition for the primary ballot.

The judge did not settle the question of whether Williams met the requirement. Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, say they support Williams and believe that she meets the residency requirement.

But Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Pat Browne, R-Allentown, said, given what is known about Williams’ residency, “it’s a legitimate concern.”

Republican Jeremy Shaffer has conceded the election in Allegheny County to Williams . The Associated Press has not called the race, and votes in Allegheny County were still being counted, elections officials said Wednesday.

Corman said he wants the matter decided before January, when senators are sworn in for a new two-year legislative session.

Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson, will develop the process for Williams to prove her residency, whether formal or informal, Corman said.

On Wednesday evening, Scarnati’s office said the Republican caucus has an obligation to ensure that Williams meets all the constitutional requirements to be a senator.

“We will develop a fair plan that gives Ms. Williams due process to set forth to the Senate why she believes she meets the residency requirement,” Scarnati’s office said in an email.

Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, said any such process may be unprecedented. He said he is happy to meet with Scarnati to discuss it, but that he is not willing to agree to any sort of process yet.

Williams, 35, is an attorney for the Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers and was making her first bid for public office.

Republicans lost at least four seats in Nov. 6’s election and hold a 28-20 advantage in the chamber, with votes still being counted in two races that were too close to call, including Williams’ race.

The question is where Williams lived on Nov. 6, 2014.

Republicans cite her vote in Maryland in the November 2014 election, a Maryland address listed on a Pennsylvania speeding ticket she paid in November 2014 and her December 2014 voter registration in Allegheny County.

Williams has maintained that she accepted a job offer in Allegheny County in the days before Nov. 6, 2014, and had begun moving by then.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.