Shaler shop owner faces more charges for assisting street gang in heroin ring |

Shaler shop owner faces more charges for assisting street gang in heroin ring

Natasha Lindstrom

A Shaler man already sentenced to more than 12 years in prison for participating in a heroin ring with the East Hills Bloods street gang is facing new charges of criminal contempt and drug offenses, federal prosecutors said Thursday.

Mayank Mishra, 38, pleaded guilty to two counts after violating judicial orders to stop selling drug paraphernalia, including cutting agents used to manufacture and dilute heroin and glassine bags, the small glossy paper packets in which heroin is often sold, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

In August 2016, a federal jury convicted Mishra and a co-conspirator of five counts of drugs and firearms offenses. Mishra and his family for years ran stores that sold the paraphernalia, including the Rock America store at Northway Mall in Ross.

He was sentenced to 12 years and seven months in prison followed by five years of probation and ordered to forfeit $906,000 seized by the government during searches of his business and home.

RELATED: Ross store owner sentenced to more than 12 years for heroin conspiracy

With the additional charges filed this week, Mishra faces up to life in prison and an unlimited fine, Brady said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Brendan T. Conway is prosecuting the case.

The investigation was led by the Greater Pittsburgh Task Force, which includes the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office and police from Pittsburgh, Oakdale, Wilkinsburg and Allegheny County.

U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon scheduled a sentencing for April 9.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.