Archive

Some say plan to issue Pennsylvania voter IDs flawed | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Some say plan to issue Pennsylvania voter IDs flawed

An Allegheny County plan to issue voter identification through a community college and nursing homes may multiply in patches of Western and Eastern Pennsylvania, though Philadelphia has written off the idea as potentially flawed, a city official said Monday.

“I don’t think our law department is in a position to say it’s legal or not legal,” said Brian Abernathy, chief of staff for Philadelphia Managing Director Richard Negrin. He said the city will promote “the surest form of action” and encourage voters to obtain photo ID through the state Department of Transportation.

His remarks were made four days after Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald declared the Community College of Allegheny County and Kane Regional Centers will offer free identification, printed on loose-leaf paper, to any Pennsylvania voter who wants it. Officials will announce specifics of that distribution this week, Fitzgerald said.

Legal observers said the plan exploits a loophole in the state’s new voter-ID law, which mandates that voters show photo ID at the polls. The law, now facing a court appeal, allows accredited colleges and senior centers to issue permissible IDs. But that provision was designed to help college students and nursing home residents, not all comers, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State.

“We have (county-owned) institutions in Allegheny County who should be committed to caring for the elderly and educating students now issuing voter identification,” said Heather Heidelbaugh, an election lawyer and Republican county councilwoman. She believes the local effort breaks state rules.

Fitzgerald, a Democrat opposed to the GOP-backed ID mandate, has said the Allegheny County plan meets the letter of the law and will expand ID access far beyond PennDOT, which issues driver’s licenses and free state IDs that can be used as identification at the polls. Some voters have reported delays and other complications at PennDOT centers, but a state spokesman said the agency will walk residents through any hitches.

Fitzgerald on Monday said “interested parties” from several counties — including Beaver, Washington and Westmoreland — have inquired about the Allegheny plan. Commissioners in Montgomery County, just west of Philadelphia, approved a similar program there on Thursday. An administrator in Northampton County, bordering New Jersey, confirmed it’s looking into the idea, too.

“It’s had a tremendous amount of support since we made this announcement,” Fitzgerald said. “I think the voters are very happy.”

County commissioners elsewhere in Western Pennsylvania said they have not approved any ID-printing measures like Allegheny’s. Officials in Democratic-leaning Beaver County and more Republican Butler County left the possibility on the table but had no specific plan to mirror Allegheny.

“I think in Allegheny County it’s a lot more difficult to get to these (PennDOT) photo-ID centers than it is in Butler County,” said Bill McCarrier, a Republican and board of commissioners chairman in Butler County.

His Democratic counterpart in Beaver County, Tony Amadio, said leaders there will discuss the concept.

“I like the idea,” Amadio said. “I think we should do everything within the realm of possibilities to make sure people can vote.”

Washington and Westmoreland counties favored Republican presidential candidate John McCain in 2008.

Adam Smeltz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5676 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.