South Dakota man gets up to 16 years for fatal Route 51 crash |

South Dakota man gets up to 16 years for fatal Route 51 crash


A South Dakota man convicted in the death of his girlfriend during a 2016 high-speed crash on Route 51 will spend at least eight years in prison, an Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas judge ruled Tuesday.

Ismael Dominguez, 27, was convicted earlier this year of 16 charges, including homicide by vehicle, homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence, involuntary manslaughter and driving under the influence.

Judge Beth Lazzara sentenced Dominguez, whose arm was severed the in crash, to 8 to 16 years in prison followed by 10 years of probation.

Dominguez was drunk when he lost control of his Hyundai Accent on Saw Mill Run Boulevard shortly about 4 p.m. Aug. 14, 2016, according to the criminal complaint. He was headed south when he crossed over a concrete median near Woodruff Street and struck several vehicles head on, which in turn caused a chain reaction crash.

In the passenger seat of the Hyundai was Dominguez’s girlfriend, 40-year-old Maria Luevano. She had to cut from vehicle, and she was pronounced dead a short time later at Allegheny General Hospital, according to the complaint.

Police said at the time that the speedometer of the Hyundai was locked at 99 mph.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.