Archive

South Fayette commissioners vote to limit drilling in township | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

South Fayette commissioners vote to limit drilling in township

PTRsouthfayette01071015
Alex Felser | Trib Total Media
South Fayette resident Alan Rank, a former commissioner, argued that gas and oil companies have plenty of incentive to do the job right.
PTRsouthfayette02071015
Alex Felser | Trib Total Media
South Fayette resident Martin Randal, a cancer survivor, asked the board to approve an ordinance limiting drilling in the township.
PTRsouthfayette03071015
Alex Felser | Trib Total Media
Anthony Cardillo, a fourth-generation resident of South Fayette, argues that homeowners have a civil right to do what they want with their property.

No energy companies have applied to drill for natural gas in South Fayette, but the township has put in place restrictions in case that happens.

Commissioners amended the gas and oil drilling ordinance to limit drilling to areas zoned for industrial use — even though the township’s planning commission, many landowners, and industry experts urged them not to do so.

“It’s too restrictive, and you are going to open yourself up to multiple lawsuits — and I will be one of them,” Mike Cardillo, a lifelong resident, said before Wednesday’s vote.

Commissioner Lisa Malosh said it’s hard for her to support drilling in the Marcellus shale “until much more is studied and known about the long-term impacts.”

But the ordinance is “completely unnecessary,” argued Commissioner Jessica Cardillo-Wagenhoffer, the dissenter in a 4-1 vote. “The current ordinance we have is restrictive enough. I believe this is taking away the rights of properties.”

South Fayette’s ordinance had allowed drilling on land zoned for commercial, business or industrial use, or where economic development is planned. The township joins a number of communities with restrictions, including Baldwin and Baldwin Borough, Forest Hills, West Homestead, Wilkinsburg, and the city of Pittsburgh.

Washington County was the site of the first well in which hydraulic fracturing of deep shale, or fracking, was successfully used. Range Resources Corp. completed the Renz well in Mt. Pleasant in 2004. Range and several other energy companies have offices at Southpointe in Cecil.

The state Department of Environmental Protection has no record of drilling in South Fayette, spokesman John Poister said. Township engineer Mike Benton said the township hasn’t received any applications.

Cardillo was among about 80 people, including landowners and industry experts, who spoke at the Board of Commissioners meeting, most of them against the ordinance.

In May, the planning commission recommended 3-1 to reject the proposal.

Attorney Krista-Ann Staley of Babst Calland argued the ordinance “violates a longstanding, basic zoning law.” Staley represents residents John and Stacy Kosky, who own about 800 acres in the township.

Township solicitor Jonathan Kamin drafted the amendment in response to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling on Act 13. The law had overruled many local drilling regulations until the state Supreme Court threw out parts of the law in December. South Fayette was a lead plaintiff in the case.

Alex Felser is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5810 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.