Archive

State’s ‘public-private’ transportation deal will replace 53 bridges in Allegheny County | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

State’s ‘public-private’ transportation deal will replace 53 bridges in Allegheny County

A team of Pennsylvania-based subcontractors has three years to replace 558 structurally deficient Pennsylvania bridges, including 53 in Allegheny County.

PennDOT Secretary Barry J. Schoch announced Friday that Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners would lead the department’s $899 million Rapid Bridge Replacement Project.

In the “public-private partnership,” the state retains ownership of the bridges, but the team is responsible for replacing the bridges and maintaining them for 25 years. Construction must begin in summer 2015.

Plenary Walsh’s proposal was selected based on scoring that considered cost, financial capability to carry out the project, background and experience in managing comparable projects. The project will cost an average of $65 million annually over 28 years.

“The goal for this project is not only finding cost savings, but also to minimize impact to the traveling public,” Schoch said. “This team has thoroughly detailed their traffic-control plans and expects to finish construction eight months earlier than required.”

According to PennDOT, the design, construction and maintenance per bridge runs about $1.6 million under the proposal, compared to more than $2 million if PennDOT’s standard process were used.

The subcontractors will be responsible for their own financing. PennDOT will make performance-based payments as the project progresses and be responsible for routine maintenance, such as snow plowing and debris removal.

Megan Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5815 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.