Survivor of synagogue shooting, Daniel Leger, discharged from hospital |

Survivor of synagogue shooting, Daniel Leger, discharged from hospital

Natasha Lindstrom
People leave flowers and take a moment to remember the 11 individuals who were killed at the mass shooting at Tree of Life congregation on Monday, Oct. 28, 2018.

A retired nurse and UPMC chaplain who was critically injured in the Oct. 27 synagogue shooting in Squirrel Hill has been released from the hospital, officials said Tuesday.

Daniel Leger , 70, of Squirrel Hill was shot in his chest during the shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue where 11 were killed and six other injured.

Leger was moved to a rehabilitation facility earlier this month and discharged on Monday, UPMC officials said via Twitter .

Friends and family describe Leger as an active member of the Squirrel Hill community and Dor Hadash, one of three Jewish congregations holding services in the Tree of Life synagogue when the shooter attacked.

“The family has kindly requested that media respects their privacy as they grieve and heal,” UPMC said in a statement.

One shooting survivor, Pittsburgh police and SWAT operator Timothy Matson , 40, remains hospitalized, UPMC said. Matson was shot multiple times in a gun battle with accused gunman Robert Bowers on the third floor on the synagogue. He is in stable condition.

Three other Pittsburgh police officers injured in the shooting have been released.

Worshiper Andrea Wedner, 61, who was shot in the arm, was released from UPMC Presbyterian on Nov. 8. Her mother, 97-year-old Rose Mallinger, was killed in the shooting.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.