ShareThis Page
U.S. Steel, United Steelworkers reach tentative contract agreement |

U.S. Steel, United Steelworkers reach tentative contract agreement

Keith Srakocic/AP

The United Steelworkers union announced Monday it has reached a compromise with U.S. Steel that looks to halt the threat of its first strike in three decades.

After six weeks of heated contract negotiations, the Downtown Pittsburgh-headquartered Fortune 250 company appears to have appeased union leaders representing steelworkers around the country.

“Every member of this union should be proud of what we’ve accomplished,” said USW International Vice President Tom Conway, chairman of the union’s bargaining committee, in a statement. “This group of workers stood up to a hugely profitable company and demanded a piece of the success they helped to create.”

The tentative four-year contract proposal — which still must be voted on by members at local chapters in coming weeks — would apply to about 14,000 steelworkers the union represents across eight states.

U.S Steel President and CEO David B. Burritt said in a statement the compromise is “fair and in the best long-term interests” of employees, customers and stockholders.

“Together, we’ve agreed on terms that will create certainty and stability for our many stakeholders; enable our company to implement our long-term business strategy, which includes continued responsible investments in our people and plants; and position U.S. Steel to remain a leader in the highly competitive global steel industry,” Burritt said.

United Steelworkers spokesman R.J. Hufnagel said union leaders representing 24 chapters in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Alabama, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota and Texas extended their stays in Downtown Pittsburgh this past week as negotiators closed in on a deal.

The union sent out a text alert to members shortly before 3 p.m. Monday announcing the tentative agreement with U.S. Steel and the bargaining committee’s unanimous recommendation of it.

Hufnagel said the revised contract proposal would extend through Sept. 1, 2022. U.S. Steel initially proposed a six-year contract, while the union sought to shorten the length of the contract.

“U.S. Steel began this process insisting upon deep concessions from a group of workers who had already made major sacrifices to help the company through a very difficult time,” USW International President Leo W. Gerard said in a statement. “It’s a testament to the power of solidarity that these workers were able to stand up with one voice and demand fair treatment.”

About 2,500 union members work at three U.S. Steel mills in Western Pennsylvania — Clairton Coke Works, Edgar Thomson Works in Braddock and Irvin Works in West Mifflin.

They had asked for better pay and benefits packages than U.S. Steel initially proposed after three years of wage freezes.

Their last contracts expired Sept. 1. Both sides agreed to extend talks.

Local union chapters unanimously gave national negotiators the authority to strike on 48 hours’ notice if negotiations had continued to falter.

Officials said they would not disclose further details about the latest contract proposal until local members review and vote on it.

RELATED : Union workers at all 3 U.S. Steel mills in Western Pa. ready to strike

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.