Archive

Uber gains PUC approval to operate in most of Pa. for 2 years | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Uber gains PUC approval to operate in most of Pa. for 2 years

The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission gave the green light Thursday to allow Uber to operate ride-sharing services across the state — except Philadelphia — for the next two years.

The commissioners gave preliminary approval in November to Uber if it met certain conditions. Among them: Uber must provide primary insurance coverage for its drivers during trips, cars more than eight years old are prohibited, certain trip data must be turned over to the PUC, and drivers must notify their insurance companies that they are using their vehicles to transport passengers for money.

The 5-0 commission vote constituted approval of Uber’s plan to meet those requirements.

Uber, known as UberX in Pittsburgh, and rival ride-share company Lyft have been battling with state regulators since they started operating in Pittsburgh early this year. Lyft has gained preliminary approval, but the commissioners are still mulling that company’s compliance plan.

The Legislature failed to act on a bill last year that would carve out a niche in the law for the companies, which allow users to hail a ride via a smartphone application. State Sen. Wayne Fontana, D-Brookline, said he planned to introduce the bill again this session.

PUC Chairman Robert Powelson said he was “exhausted by this case” and that he looked forward to working with the General Assembly on the issue.

The approval does not end the battle over whether Uber should be fined for operating during a cease-and-desist order. The agency’s Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement proposed fining Uber $19 million. A hearing before two administrative law judges is scheduled in February.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.