Uber plans major expansion at self-driving car test track in Pittsburgh |

Uber plans major expansion at self-driving car test track in Pittsburgh

Aaron Aupperlee
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Cars sit on model streets inside of the Uber self-driving-car test track in Hazelwood on Thursday, March 23, 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Cars sit on model streets inside of the Uber self-driving-car test track in Hazelwood on Thursday, March 23, 2017.

Uber plans to double its office and storage space at its test track at the Almono development site in Pittsburgh’s Hazelwood neighborhood.

The company wants to add about 7,000 square feet of office space to the existing 6,000 square feet at the test track site and 9,250 square feet of storage space to the existing 11,000 square feet, the company told Pittsburgh’s Zoning Board of Adjustment on Thursday.

Jeff Fullerton, engineering operations manager at Uber’s Advanced Technology Center, said as the company’s operations in Pittsburgh have expanded, it has needed more room at the test track. Fullerton said the company is in the early planning stages of the project and didn’t have a timeline for completion.

Appearing before the Zoning Board of Adjustment to seek approval was the first step, Fullerton said.

“So what the heck is a test track and what are you going to do with it?” asked Alice Mitinger, chair of the board.

Fullerton replied that the track is Uber’s local proving ground for its autonomous vehicles but didn’t elaborate much more. Uber tests new autonomous driving software at the track before it is used on public roads.

Uber’s test track sits at the southern end of the 178-acre Almono development at the site of the former LTV steel mill. The facility’s roads and buildings are temporary. The section of the Almono development where the test track sits ultimately will become housing. Uber is responsible for removing its test track and the buildings associated with it to make way for the housing. The site is zoned residential, but Uber is using it for commercial purposes. That’s why it needs board approval to expand.

Uber began developing the site last year and has it for three to five years.

The 42-acre test track site is surrounded by a high fence draped in black cloth. Peering over the fence gives a glimpse of a network of streets, stop signs and traffic lights. There are shipping containers stacked to look like buildings and parked vehicles along the roads.

Fullerton wouldn’t say how many cars the company tests at the facility. On an afternoon this month, at least six cars could be seen driving around the facility.

The company has been hesitant to identify its facilities throughout the city. Five are known: four in the Strip District and the Almono test track. The company also signed a 10-year lease for a portion of the roundhouse building at Almono.

The company will be back in front of the Zoning Board of Adjustment in April when it will ask to build an eight-foot privacy fence at its 32nd Street facility in the Strip District. Zoning rules require side and rear setback for fences. Uber is requesting no setbacks.

Enforcement of zoning rules and careful consideration of requests for zoning variances are among the few tools the city has to control Uber’s use of Pittsburgh as a proving ground. The state controls the rules of the roads, and legislation aimed at regulating the testing of autonomous vehicles in Pennsylvania is stuck in committee in Harrisburg.

Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto has been critical of Uber of late and its reluctance to partner with the city. The mayor has blamed Uber’s unwillingness to work with the city for Pittsburgh losing to Columbus, Ohio, in the U.S. Department of Transportation’s $50 million Smart City Challenge.

Uber and city officials have no formal agreements or partnerships, said Tim McNulty, a spokesman for the mayor.

Uber did not request nor did the city grant permission for it to use the city streets for testing its self-driving cars. The city couldn’t grant or deny such permission if it wanted to, McNulty said.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or 412-336-8448.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.