ShareThis Page
Vaping ban in public spaces, workplaces a step closer in Allegheny County |

Vaping ban in public spaces, workplaces a step closer in Allegheny County

Stephanie Strasburg | Trib Total Media
Alisha Basinger, 31, of Connellsville, blows vapor into the air with fellow 'vapers' as they gather at the VCCPA15: A Vaping & eCig Convention at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center in Downtown on Sunday, June 14, 2015.
Natasha Lindstrom;
Bill Godshall, executive director of Smoke-Free Pennsylvania, speaks during the public comment portion of a meeting of the Allegheny County Board of Health last week. Godshall, who advocates vaping as a way to quit smoking, said he's 'disappointed' the board green-lighted a countywide indoor vaping ban and is hopeful the county council will strike it down.
Natasha Lindstrom
Vaping enthusiasts filled a standing-room only meeting of the Allegheny County Board of Health last week. Despite their pleas against it, the board voted unanimously to advance a countywide indoor ban on e-cigarettes and vaping products.
Natasha Lindstrom
Jeff Bailey, assistant solicitor for the Allegheny County Health Department, outlines minor modifications made based on public input to the proposed indoor ban on vaping and e-cigarettes, with changes including adding a violation for e-cig shops that permit minors to enter, and adjusting criminal penalties to range from $250 for a first offense up to $1,000.
Natasha Lindstrom
R.J. Marino (center), owner of Cool Vapes in Cranberry and near Ross Park Mall, chats with Bill Godshall (front right), executive director of Smoke-Free PA, and vaper Zach Peters (back right) of Portersville following last week's Allegheny County Board of Health meeting. The vaping enthusiasts lamented the board's approval of a countywide indoor e-cigarette ban.

The Allegheny County Board of Health voted unanimously Wednesday to ban vaping indoors in public places and workplaces countywide in a sweeping regulation of e-cigarettes that mimics existing rules on the conventional tobacco-filled kind.

“I’m blown away,” said Marc Conn, 30, co-owner of Steel City Vapors in Castle Shannon and Monroeville. “An elected board of officials are telling private business owners what they can and can’t do in their business, even though they have absolutely no facts proving that these have negative consequences.”

Conn, who says he quit smoking conventional cigarettes five years ago on the day he tried an e-cigarette, joined several pro-vaping speakers urging the board to vote down the ban, which they believe unfairly treats vapers the same as traditional smokers.

“To any smoker in the room who quit smoking, I totally applaud your efforts,” health department director Dr. Karen Hacker told the audience shortly before the vote.

“I don’t really think that the regulations that we are proposing in any way demonize vaping,” Hacker continued, noting the health department would support vaping as a safer alternative to smoking if vaping “proves to be a well-examined strategy for smoking cessation.”

The ban — which must be approved by county council — would prohibit inhaling, exhaling or using e-cigarettes or vapor products in enclosed workplaces, eateries, schools, health care-related properties, sports facilities, theaters, transit stations and vehicles used for mass transportation. In line with Pennsylvania’s Clean Indoor Air Act, facilities that allow traditional cigarette smoking such as bars, private clubs and tobacco shops that don’t serve food would be exempt.

County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, through his spokeswoman Amie Downs, declined comment.

“If you put us with smokers, that’s like putting someone in an (Alcoholics Anonymous) meeting in a bar,” said Amy Crivella, 37, owner of East Coast Vapes in Cranberry. “They’re not treating us like we’re trying to quit.”

E-cigarette users heat flavored liquids containing varying levels of nicotine with battery-operated devices. The trend has increased in controversy and popularity over the past several years. Advocates insist vaping is safer than tobacco cigarettes and view it as a way to help people quit smoking, but public health agencies have questioned its safety and unregulated nature.

Erika Fricke, health policy director for Allies for Children, testified she believes the ban does not keep vapers from experiencing the potential benefits of e-cigarettes.

“Rather, they’re saying, ‘OK, we do not as a culture want to take a step backward in public spaces and allow e-cigarettes in a place where cigarettes are not currently allowed to be smoked,” said Fricke, who expressed concerns over indoor vaping “normalizing” the use of tobacco products and threatening to get young kids addicted to nicotine.

“I don’t want my children or the children of Allegheny County to see e-cigarette smoking in places where cigarette smoking is banned, and neither do I want them to be exposed to the second-hand vapors from e-cigarettes when we don’t yet know the impacts on their health.”

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.