Archive

ShareThis Page
Washington County man gets probation for defrauding PennDOT, Turnpike Commission | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Washington County man gets probation for defrauding PennDOT, Turnpike Commission

webbail2
webbail2

A Washington County man was sentenced to three years of federal probation for illegally obtaining contracts for bridge projects from PennDOT and the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, according to a news release from U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady.

U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer on Tuesday ordered Donald R. Taylor, 78, of Eighty-Four, to perform 300 hours of community service and pay a $30,000 fine.

Taylor was the owner of Century Steel Erectors Co. when he used another company — WMCC, Inc. — as a “front” to obtain the federally funded contracts, authorities said in the news release. Century Steel Erectors was not certified in the U.S. Department of Transportation’s disadvantage business enterprise program, but WMCC was.

The program encourages the use of small, minority-owned businesses in federally funded projects, officials said.

Taylor admitted to concealing his company’s role in contracts awarded to WMCC by covering his business logo on company vehicles at job sites and presenting his employees as WMCC workers, among other things, according to the news release.

Both companies fraudulently obtained PennDOT subcontracts for nine projects between 2012 and 2014 totalling about $1.065 million.

Taylor pleaded guilty on Oct. 30 and paid $85,221 in restitution to PennDOT.Co-defendant Watson L. Maloy Jr. was sentenced in February to two years of probation and a $1,000 fine. Taylor told investigators that he paid Maloy a periodic fee ranging from $2,000 to $10,000 for allowing Taylor to use WMCC, Inc., Maloy’s business.Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.