Watchdogs call for better transparency of nonprofits’ IRS filings |

Watchdogs call for better transparency of nonprofits’ IRS filings

Audrius Reskevicius
These are Form 990 tax filings by exempt organizations dating back to 2002 in DVD form — the only way the IRS makes them available to the public. The DVDs, which belong to open records advocate Carl Malamud, weigh 98.7 pounds. It would cost $2,300 for an individual to get a complete set of all returns filed between 2008 and 2014.
Marcus S. Owens, attorney with Caplin & Drysdale’s Washington office, ran the IRS Exempt Organizations Division from 1990 to 2000.
Courtesy of Kirk Walter
Carl Malamud, technologist and public domain advocate, stands in the loading dock portion of his Public.Resource.Org factory floor in Northern California.
Kirk Walter
Carl Malamud, the open records advocate who founded Public.Resource.Org, films a test Kickstarter video on his organization's factory floor in Northern California.

Marcus S. Owens has observed troubling trends since stepping down as director of the Internal Revenue Service’s exempt organizations division 14 years ago.

The nation’s nonprofit sector is proliferating, just as resources available to federal and state oversight arms shrink or stagnate.

The IRS is shying away from public scrutiny, reeling from years of budget cuts and the aftermath of last year’s scandal over the agency’s selective audit of Tea Party groups.

And it’s easier than ever for most applicants to secure tax-exempt status, through a shorter, self-certification process the IRS began in July to lighten its backlog.

All of that adds up to a warning from Owens.

“The agency’s attitude toward tax-exempt (oversight) seems to be moving to one of, ‘It’s not worth the hassle,’ ” said Owens, who spent 25 years with the IRS before taking a job as a Washington attorney. “I think it’s setting the stage for a real scandal down the road.”

The tenuous regulatory environment raises concern among other experts that it could become easier for bad actors to go undetected in a sector flush with hundreds of billions of dollars from donors and taxpayers. Charity Navigator ranked the Pittsburgh area fifth nationally this year in financial health.

The region’s charities control $24.2 billion in assets and take in $16.6 billion in revenue, according to 2012 figures from the National Center for Charitable Statistics.

“There’s not enough enforcement muscle at the IRS, and there’s not enough at the state level,” said Chuck McLean, vice president of research for GuideStar, which publishes nonprofit tax data online. “It is my belief that there is very little intentional malfeasance, but it would not be difficult to get away with it, because there are not enough resources.”

Procedural remedy

Watchdogs, researchers and nonprofit advocates suggest a partial remedy to the enforcement dilemma: Mandate that all nonprofits file tax forms online, and release those public records in an open, searchable data format.

The IRS releases the forms only in an image file, making it difficult to search for words and figures or identify aggregate trends without painstakingly key-punching information found on millions of pages.

Advocates say the procedural change could bring meaningful transparency and self-policing to the tax-exempt sector, which accounts for more than 10 percent of non-government jobs and $532.1 billion in wages.

“At the end of the day, it’s not about nonprofits doing anything wrong,” said Rick Cohen, spokesman for the National Council of Nonprofits. “It’s about a person committing fraud against a nonprofit, and the people in the community who aren’t being served because those dollars were being diverted.”

About half of nonprofits choose to file tax forms electronically, but the IRS takes a snapshot of those files before releasing them. That destroys the searchable metadata, said Carl Malamud, an open records advocate in Northern California who is suing the IRS to obtain nine tax returns in the format the nonprofits used for online submission.

“We’re shooting ourselves in the foot by not releasing the e-file data,” said Malamud, who founded Public.Resource.Org and was responsible for getting Securities and Exchange Commission data online in the 1990s. “It’s really stupid.”

Can’t keep up

The proposed e-filing change has the backing of President Obama, who included the provision in his 2014 and 2015 budgets, and wide bipartisan support in Congress, aides say. It was folded into stalled comprehensive tax reform legislation.

“This is a common-sense proposal with no opposition that we know of, that is just not moving forward due to gridlock,” said Cinthia Schuman Ottinger, deputy director of philanthropy programs for the Washington-based Aspen Institute.

Aside from catching abuse, researchers say, the release would enable the sector to develop useful applications, pinpoint effective consultants and identify causes threatened by higher rates of insolvency.

The number of American nonprofits filing annual returns nearly doubled in the past decade, up to nearly 1.1 million in 2013, IRS data show.

Meanwhile, the IRS lost the equivalent of more than 12,000 full-time positions and nearly $1 billion. In 2013, the IRS examined 0.71 percent of charitable organizations, down from 0.81 percent in 2011 and lower than rates for individuals (1 percent) and corporations (1.4 percent), the Government Accountability Office wrote in a report this month.

“To be fair, the IRS has gotten their budget cut over and over and over again,” Malamud said. “On the other hand, this is pretty simple to do.”

Support for e-filing

As e-filing becomes more common, fewer people are expressing concern that such a mandate would be too onerous for nonprofits. Even the IRS indicated in writing its support for upgrading its technological processes, though agency officials say they don’t have the capacity to do so.

Tamera Ripperda, the director of exempt organizations for the IRS, declined multiple requests for an interview.

“There may be short-term investments, but it would be miniscule in comparison to the amount of time we save and the stewardship of the sector,” said Kate Dewey, president of the Forbes Funds, a supporting organization of The Pittsburgh Foundation.

The National Association of State Charity Officials lauds mandatory e-filing as a way to help root out fraud. Investigators could, for example, instantly pull up a query on every nonprofit that gave a CEO a loan and examine why, or more easily spot questionable connections such as an executive concealing pay across several nonprofits.

Pennsylvania’s attorney general has an investigative section focused on nonprofits, but the unit’s 25-employee team typically is swamped by 1,800 to 2,000 cases a year involving disputes over estates, wills and trusts, leaving enough time and resources to handle about 100 open cases involving suspicious solicitation, said Mark Pacella, who oversees the Charitable Trusts and Organizations Section.

“We rely on boards of directors to be our first line of defense, and we hope donors will make smart decisions,” Pacella said.

Temporary solution posts 990 forms online free to users with accounts, but the forms are in non-searchable PDF files and tend to be about two years behind.

The IRS charges individuals $2,300 to obtain a CD or DVD with a complete set of 990s filed monthly between 2008 and 2014, or $100 for a set of returns filed quarterly in a particular state.

Each month, Malamud gets a box of 30 to 40 of those DVDs shipped to his office in Sebastopol, Calif. He fires up a row of DVD burners and begins the 48-hour process of translating the information into more user-friendly formats. He has compiled 7.9 million filings dating to 2002 — but would rather not play that middleman role. He wants searchable forms accessible to everyone from GuideStar to Google to the average citizen.

Malamud is scheduled to return to U.S. District Court on Jan. 14, when his attorneys and the IRS will make oral arguments. The judge could issue a summary judgment.

“Normally, there’s great deference to the government when the government says, ‘This would be very hard to do,’ ” Malamud said, “but I think we’ve poked a lot of holes in their arguments, and I am very hopeful we’re going to win.”

Natasha Lindstrom is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.