ShareThis Page
Westmoreland Museum of American Art position renamed for Scaife |

Westmoreland Museum of American Art position renamed for Scaife

The Westmoreland Museum of American Art’s board of trustees voted unanimously to rename the museum’s top executive position after late Tribune-Review publisher and owner Dick Scaife.

The title for Judith O’Toole and her successors will change from director/CEO to “The Richard M. Scaife Director/CEO,” the board announced early Tuesday.

“It is almost as though his good counsel and collegial companionship is still with me through this name,” said O’Toole, who recalled having conversations about art with Scaife “like a colleague.”

Board president Bruce M. Wolf said the board deliberated for months “to find a way to acknowledge the game-changing contributions” of Scaife, the billionaire philanthropist and Mellon heir who died in July at 82.

Naming the directorship after Scaife is “a symbol of his dedication to the institution as a whole, including collections, exhibitions and programs,” and “will carry his name into the museum’s future as a legacy impact,” Wolf said.

A lifelong collector of mostly American art, Scaife counted Westmoreland as one of his favorite museums. In his will, Scaife bequeathed half of his 500-plus fine artworks to the museum, along with several prized John Kane paintings.

O’Toole has said she believes that Scaife’s gift, coupled with a $38 million renovation project, will make her institution “one of the most important museums of American art in the country.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.