‘We’ve lost her to the sea’: Pittsburgh woman missing in Mexico feared drowned |

‘We’ve lost her to the sea’: Pittsburgh woman missing in Mexico feared drowned

Megan Guza
Caley Manning (Facebook)

The mother of a Mount Washington woman last seen vacationing in Mexico last week believes her daughter drowned.

“Our Caley Manning is not missing. We’ve lost her to the sea,” Falcon Taylor, who identified herself on Facebook as Manning’s mother, wrote in a Nov. 19 post.

Manning, 39, and a friend were vacationing at the Mia Reef resort on Isla Mujeres when she disappeared Nov. 13, according to the Riviera Maya News.

Taylor wrote on Facebook that her daughter decided to take a swim the night she went missing.

“Caley was a very strong woman physically and always loved to swim,” she wrote. “And she loved a challenge. But she made a tragic mistake that night.”

Riviera Maya News reported that an emergency call was received at about 2 a.m. Nov. 13 indicating that a person fell into the ocean near a seawall.

“There were people who witnessed and called 911 immediately,” Taylor wrote. “There is a naval station on the island and they sent search and rescue ships. They continued to search in numerous grid formations for several days.”

Manning’s boyfriend, Patrick Smith, told Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV that he got a passport and flew to Mexico to search for her.

“She had a couple drinks, beer and a shot, went over to (the) wall, hopped on down and went for a swim,” he told WPXI. “Everyone was calling her back and she said, ‘I can swim. I can swim!’”

He told the TV station that it sounded like something Manning would do.

“She was bold, fierce, and she was fearless,” he said.

Taylor wrote that her daughter found solace in each visit to the ocean when she was growing up in Florida.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.