Archive

Wilkinsburg woman accused of starving 3 children | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Wilkinsburg woman accused of starving 3 children

Renatta Signorini
570319webhandcuffsdark

A Wilkinsburg woman is accused of starving three children that had been in her care for seven months, according to Allegheny County police.

Jennifer Stout, 35, was jailed Saturday on charges of aggravated assault, child endangerment and reckless endangerment.

Authorities said in a criminal complaint that the three children — two girls, ages 12 and 9, and a 2-year-old boy — were taken to UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh on Thursday by their aunt. Family members told police that the children’s mother left them with Stout during the summer, according to the complaint.

The aunt reported deplorable conditions at Stout’s Hunter Street home and she immediately took the children to the hospital because they were in bad shape. Doctors told police that the 12-year-old girl had lost 19 pounds since September and the 9-year-old girl had lost 14 pounds since July.

The toddler weighed 19 pounds. Authorities said he had weighed 27 pounds in September, according to the affidavit. The boy had what appeared to be ligature marks on his wrists and ankles, bruises all over his body and hair loss related to starvation, police said.

Stout told investigators denied intentionally starving the children, but said she should have taken the boy to get medical attention. She is being held in the Allegheny County Jail on $25,000 bail.

She did not have an attorney listed in online court records. A Jan. 3 preliminary hearing is set.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.