Woodland Hills teen no longer seeking charges against principal |

Woodland Hills teen no longer seeking charges against principal

Ben Schmitt
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Kevin Murray, as seen Dec. 6, 2016.

The attorney for a former Woodland Hills High School student who recorded his principal making threatening remarks withdrew a private criminal complaint against the school leader.

However, Todd Hollis did not initially deem it necessary to appear in court and inform the presiding judge of his decision to back out of the case.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Manning was irritated when Hollis failed to appear in court Thursday to withdraw his petition. Manning had a staff member call Hollis, and the attorney showed up an hour later.

The hearing stemmed from Hollis’ petition to revisit Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.’s decision not to criminally charge the principal, Kevin Murray.

In the recordings, which were captured by the teen on his phone in April and released in late November, Murray can be heard telling the student, “I’ll punch you right in your face, dude,” and “I’ll knock your (expletive) teeth down your throat.”

In another portion of the recording, Murray tells the special education student he would prevail in court.

“When we go down to court, it’s your word versus mine,” Murray said in the recording. “And mine wins every time.”

It’s illegal in Pennsylvania to record someone without permission unless there is not an expectation of privacy.

Murray was placed on paid leave Nov. 30 after the audio surfaced and stayed away from the school during criminal and administrative investigations. He returned to work Jan. 18.

Asked Thursday why he dropped his petition, Hollis said, “We believe it’s in the best interest of my client to move forward.”

The teen is not charged with a crime for recording Murray. However, he is accused of violating Pennsylvania’s wiretap law because of an unrelated recording authorities said he made in September during a meeting with school officials that was posted on social media. A preliminary hearing on those charges is scheduled for Feb. 27 in Allegheny County Juvenile Court.

“My client has a pending criminal complaint and a civil matter pending,” Hollis said. “We will focus our resources on those goals.”

Staff writer Chris Togneri contributed. Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.