Plum working to save K-9 unit without raising taxes |

Plum working to save K-9 unit without raising taxes

Michael DiVittorio
Lillian DeDomenic | For the Tribune-Review
Plum K-9 Officer Lee Temple and his dog Voda at work at the high school.

Plum council may keep or expand its police department’s K-9 unit after previously voting to disband it.

Mike Dell, finance committee chairman and council vice president, said his committee is crafting next year’s budget to include options of having one to three dogs at the police department.

“We are still working on it,” Dell said about the spending plan that will be adopted in December. “We have the direction now to budget up to three dogs. We’re trying to incorporate the program without any tax increase.”

Council voted unanimously June 12 to end the program Dec. 31. Some officials said it isn’t worth the $20,000 a year cost. Since then, residents have packed council meetings and circulated petitions in an effort to save the program. The push by the public led councilors in August to announce the program would be reexamined.

Councilman Dave Seitz said police Chief Jeff Armstrong has provided a review of the K-9 program and outlined what would be needed to maintain it with one dog or to add to the force. That report included:

• Replacing the K-9 SUV at an estimated cost of $40,000.

• Approximate cost of a dog is $8,000-9,000, which could be offset by grants and donations.

• Estimated cost of yearly care and training for a dog is $13,670.

• Contractual obligations include “hidden costs” like having to pay the K-9 officer overtime for training sessions.

“We’re not opposed to the program,” Seitz said. “We’re trying to keep the program and actually improve the program. We’re moving down the road like we said we would.”

Seitz and other council members said the current contract governing the K-9 unit has to be reworked to make the program viable. The board met in executive session last week to talk about the contract but did not say what was discussed afterwards.

The contract requires that the borough pay for health care and maintenance of dogs that retire from the force. K-9 Officer Lee Temple’s Belgian Malinois, Voda, is scheduled to retire this year. Temple’s last dog retired in 2007. Temple said he has not had any discussion about the program with council for about two months.

“I’m glad that council’s reconsidering the position” Temple said. “It’s valuable to the community. I hope it can be worked out soon. I’m thankful for the people that supported me and the program. This is what I love to do.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.