Plum school board furloughs 26 teachers, raises taxes |

Plum school board furloughs 26 teachers, raises taxes

Michael DiVittorio
Plum School District.

Plum School District’s 2018-19 spending plan carries significant changes to staff, taxes and curriculum.

The board voted 5-3 June 26 to approve a 2018-19 budget including furloughs of 26 teachers and one administrator, a 0.8327-mill hike and a move to half-day kindergarten.

Board members in favor of the budget were Angela Anderson, Jim Rogers, Brian Wisniewski, Rich Zucco and board Vice President Vicky Roessler.

Scott Kolar, Sue Caldwell and board President Steve Schlauch dissented. Scott Coulson was absent.

The bulk of the furloughs come from the closure of Regency Park Elementary School. District officials did not publicly name the affected employees.

The adopted tax resolution sets next year’s millage rate at 21.0757 mills. Owners of a $121,000 assessed property would pay $101 more in taxes as a result of the increase.

The move to half-day kindergarten is a cost-saving effort.

The budget lists revenue at $63,240,102 and expenses at $64,681,312, with the shortfall covered by $1,441,210 in reserve funds.

Schlauch said he opposed the budget due to the tax increase.

“My top priority has always been to provide the best education possible for our students at a cost affordable to the hard-working families and seniors of this borough,” he said.

Caldwell expressed frustrations about the teachers’ union not pushing an early retirement incentive offered by the district, which could have saved a few furloughed teachers. She also said the budget kept too many classes with low enrollment and little student interest, referencing high school courses with only three to 10 students signed up.

Superintendent Brendan Hyland said the district must continue to have “a comprehensive high school,” and cutting those low-enrollment classes would not have been enough to eliminate another position.

“We need to get the enrollment up in some of those courses,” Hyland said. “We need to get our kids to start taking more (advanced placement) courses. I think it’s important that we keep those. Once we lose some of those courses, it’s very difficult to get them back.”

Roessler said she reluctantly supported the budget and tax increase, and that the board needs to fix mistakes made in previous years.

“The last two years, the majority of previous boards voted for budgets that were against the recommendation of experts, then borrowed $13 million, raised taxes and called it a day,” she said. “Then, add the $4 million accounting mistake by the (former) business manager that helped bring us to where we are today,” she added, referring to an overestimation of local real estate taxes made over time.

Zucco agreed previous boards did not do enough to address revenue and expense problems, but that the problems the district has were predicted by former board President Kevin Dowdell about four years ago.

“We kicked the can down the road,” Zucco said. “The can is at the end of the road.”

The board raised taxes last year by 0.866 mills and took out a 12-year, $5.6 million loan. It used approximately $1.4 million of the borrowed money to balance the budget.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.