ShareThis Page
Oakmont to cut nine trees to help save track at Riverside Park |

Oakmont to cut nine trees to help save track at Riverside Park


Oakmont officials plan to cut nine trees in the lower level of Riverside Park to help alleviate current and future track problems.

Council on Monday authorized borough Manager Lisa Cooper Jensen to solicit bids for the work. It was unclear when a contract could be awarded.

Roots growing out of the ground have created several bumps in sections of the track, which was deemed unsafe for competition as a result last year.

Borough officials said at previous meetings five of the roughly 25 trees in the lower portion of the park across from Riverview High School were causing the problems.

Councilwoman Leah Powers explained this month that a state forester and officials from Environmental Planning and Design suggested the removal of 14 trees, and nine was a compromise.

“Those five trees may be the ones lifting the track, and the rest of them have potential the way they’re growing,” she said. “Some of them maybe could have been saved, but are in the way and showing signs of stress.”

Powers said the borough’s forming a plan to eventually replace some of the trees. The number of tree replacements has not been finalized.

Riverview High School’s track team plans to have no home track meets for the second consecutive season because of the track conditions.

Powers said she recently met with Riverview School District officials about sharing the cost of the project, and hopes to get some type of financial commitment by October.

Oakmont budgeted $70,000 for track repairs and $40,000 for tree removal.

Calls to district officials were not immediately returned.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.