Oakmont developing plan to make life better for pedestrians |

Oakmont developing plan to make life better for pedestrians

Michael DiVittorio
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Oakmont council decided not to lift the temporary one-way restriction on Cedar Way that was to expire at the end of this month.
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Oakmont officials seek to improve sidewalks and increase foot traffic through a pedestrian plan.

Oakmont has hired a consulting firm to study pedestrian traffic and develop a plan showing things that could be done to make walking easier and safer in the borough.

Pittsburgh’s Environmental Planning and Design started the project this month and will present the plan to council by July. The firm’s work will include things such as identifying where and when most people walk in the borough, what areas need sidewalks, and tracking which intersections most need improvements to make them safer for pedestrians.

“This will complement and expand our comprehensive plan,” assistant borough Manager Carol Moore said.

Oakmont was awarded an $11,000 grant to develop the pedestrian plan from the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health’s WalkWorks program. It also received $10,000 from a Department of Conservation and Natural Resources recreational program.

Moore said developing the project could lead to grants for implementation of suggested improvements included in the pedestrian plan.

“It’s one of the ways … to increase physical activity in Oakmont,” Moore said about making improvements for pedestrians.

Oakmont was one of four communities, and the only one in Allegheny County, to receive WalkWorks funding.

Project Director Carolyn Yagle said first drafts of the pedestrian plan should be ready by April. There will be public hearings on the plan, a survey in the borough’s newsletter, and information on the borough’s website as it becomes available through the consulting firm.

A group of representatives of the borough, Riverview School District, Riverview Community Action Corp., Allegheny County Health Department and PennDOT has also been formed to help with development of the pedestrian plan.

“It’s definitely a good thing,” Community Action Director Stephanie Woolford said. “We have a lot of seniors who walk, so we think it’s a great idea (to have a pedestrian plan).”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.