Riverview School District and union officials agree to fact-finding in new contract talks |

Riverview School District and union officials agree to fact-finding in new contract talks


Riverview School District and teachers union officials have postponed future contract negotiations.

Riverview Education Association President Mark Capsambelis said the union requested the state Labor Relations Board appoint an independent fact-finder after the latest negotiation session failed to result in a new deal.

Both parties last met on Nov. 15 for about six hours.

“While discussions were constructive, the parties were unable to move closer on economics and some of the remaining language,” according to a post on the district’s website,

Capsambelis said Robert Creo, a Pittsburgh-based mediator and arbitrator, was named the fact-finder.

Board President McClure said both parties were advised not to talk about the fact-finding.

She said the district has great teachers, and salaries continue to be one of the major sticking points.

“I think the meetings have been cordial,” she said. “We wish we could pay them more, but we have limited budgets. We’re trying to do the best we can for everybody. I’m happy to pay more in taxes for good teachers, but there are a lot of people who can’t (afford a tax increase). We have to balance the needs of the tax payers with the needs of teachers, and both of them against the needs of the students because the students come first.”

A hearing’s scheduled for Dec. 18 and Creo’s report is due Dec. 30.

The district and union will have 10 days to vote whether to accept the report.

The report could result in a new contract if both sides accept it.

Capsambelis said the report would be made public if either side rejects it, and a second vote would be required. Negotiations would resume if both parties reject the report.

The union president could not confirm whether teachers would strike in January if an agreement’s not reached.

Its members voted Oct. 10 to authorize its negotiating team to call a strike if necessary.

“The REA is hopeful that an agreement can be reached as soon as possible so that we can focus on the education of the children of the Verona and Oakmont communities,” Capsambelis said.

The union’s 90 members have been without a contract since July. The last contract was a four-year deal.

There are about 995 students in the district from Oakmont and Verona.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.