ShareThis Page
Police investigating Blairsville student’s comments about Parkland shooting |

Police investigating Blairsville student’s comments about Parkland shooting

| Monday, February 19, 2018 8:24 a.m.

A student was removed from Blairsville High School on Friday after fellow students reported overhearing him make “inappropriate comments” about a Florida school shooting, according to district officials.

This was at least the eighth incident in the past month — and fourth since last week’s deadly shooting in Parkland, Fla. — in which school officials in southwestern Pennsylvania reacted to threats of potential school violence.

State police on Sunday arrested a 17-year-old Somerset County teenager for allegedly threatening to “shoot up” Shade High School.

State police did not identify that student nor the 18-year-old Blairsville student involved in the incident there. No charges had been filed against him Monday.

In a letter to parents, Blairsville-Saltsburg schools Assistant Superintendent Jeffrey Soles commended students and faculty for notifying administrators at the Indiana County school. State police said the suspect “made comments regarding the school district,” but authorities determined there was no threat to the Burrell Township building.

“This situation was contained and dealt with quickly because of those students who had the courage to inform an adult,” Soles wrote in the letter.

School officials and others across the region and country have encouraged students and faculty to adopt the practice of “see something, say something” after yet another school shooting last week.

Nikolas Cruz, 19, allegedly killed 17 people Wednesday at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla.

Officials with local school districts have responded to a number of recent threats both before and after the Florida shooting, which was at least the fifth at a U.S. school this year.

• Franklin Regional school officials on Friday canceled classes across the Murrysville district after a student posted a threatening Snapchat photo . That student, who has not been identified, was taken in for a mental health evaluation and probably will not be charged with a crime, police said.

• Also on Friday, Monroeville police arrested a Gateway High School student after he posted

an alleged “terroristic threat” on Snapchat, a popular image-sharing social media app. Officials did not offer details about the post, other than to say the message referenced the Florida school shooting.

• Last Wednesday, South Park High School in Pittsburgh’s South Hills increased its police presence after discovering a possible threat made by a student on Snapchat. In a letter to parents, Superintendent Wayne P. Gdovic said police believe the threat wasn’t credible but that the incident was still being investigated.

• In early February, police in Cambria County arrested a teenager in connection with a threat to “shoot up” a high school in Johnstown’s Westmont Hilltop School District.

• In late January, police arrested a 14-year-old Uniontown Area High School freshman after another student reported hearing discussion on a school bus of a planned school shooting . Police confiscated several firearms and other weapons from the boy’s bedroom. He is charged as a juvenile with terroristic threats, unlawful possession of a firearm and attempting to cause a catastrophe. Officials did not identify him.

• Also in late January, officials with the Laurel Highlands School District canceled classes after written threat was discovered on a wall in a middle school girls’ restroom.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.