ShareThis Page
State police find Apollo man dead after incident at Somerset hunting cabin |

State police find Apollo man dead after incident at Somerset hunting cabin

| Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:00 p.m.

An Apollo man died of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound over the weekend after first firing on a friend at a Somerset County hunting cabin. The friend was not injured, state police said.

Police found Donald Smodic, 57, in Salem Township, around 8 a.m. Saturday, dead of a gunshot wound to the chest. He was discovered at the turnpike maintenance entrance of Toll Route 66, mile marker 12, police said.

Troopers originally responded to a hunting cabin in Larimer Township, Somerset County, at 2:30 a.m. Saturday for a report of shots fired. The subsequent investigation showed that Smodic had been drinking and that he and his friend got into an altercation, police reported.

Smodic left the cabin and put two semiautomatic long guns and ammunition in his vehicle. He then removed the firearms and fired an estimated 121 rounds at the cabin before fleeing, police said.

Police found Smodic several hours later after an “extensive” search. The incident remains under investigation.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1280, or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.