ShareThis Page
Monroeville man accused of impersonating a police officer |

Monroeville man accused of impersonating a police officer

| Thursday, April 26, 2018 2:27 p.m.

A Monroeville man is accused of impersonating a law enforcement officer in an attempt to have state police arrest a Somerset resident on a fictitious warrant, troopers reported.

John K. Balaschak, 61, is charged by state police in Somerset with impersonating a law enforcement officer, making false reports and false alarms to a public safety agency. The complaints were filed before Somerset District Judge Kenneth Johnson.

Trooper Jeremy Lischak reported in court documents that Balaschak called Somerset troopers on March 22 and identified himself as a “federally licensed officer in Washington D.C.” and asked to have a Somerset man arrested on an out-of-state arrest warrant.

“Balaschak is not a federal employee or a law enforcement officer,” Lischak wrote.

He also reported the arrest warrant Balaschak claimed was issued for the area resident “did not exist.”

Reached by phone, Balaschak declined comment.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled May 29.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.