Senators ask Wolf to press for relief from ‘summer gas’ mandate |

Senators ask Wolf to press for relief from ‘summer gas’ mandate

Brian C. Rittmeyer

Three Republican state senators are asking Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf to support lifting the requirement for “summer gas,” which drives up the cost of gasoline in Western Pennsylvania.

Sens. Elder Vogel, Randy Vulakovich and Don White in a letter urged Wolf to push the state Department of Environmental Protection to formally petition the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

It comes the same week that the average price of a gallon of gas in Pennsylvania reached $3, for the first time since November 2014.

“In order to avoid an unnecessary increase in gasoline prices this summer, we request you urgently instruct your DEP to take any and all actions necessary to… formally request suspension of this unnecessary regulation through whatever waivers or notice may be needed,” the senators wrote in a letter to the governor.

Wolf spokesman J.J. Abbott said the administration shares the senators’ desire to end the requirement.

“In fact, last week DEP announced that the department will no longer enforce the low RVP rule,” Abbott said. “DEP expects to submit the formal… revision shortly, and will work with EPA to see that it is reviewed and hopefully approved as quickly as possible.”

Since 1999, the state Department of Environmental Protection and federal Environmental Protection Agency have required that gasoline sold between May 1 and September 15 in the seven-county Greater Pittsburgh area have a Reid Vapor Pressure, or RVP, of 7.8 psi. Regular gasoline has an RVP of 9.0.

It’s intended to reduce air pollution.

This “summer gas” is routinely more expensive than gasoline sold in the rest of Pennsylvania and also in neighboring Ohio and West Virginia, the senators said.

“Surely you are as eager to avoid increasing gasoline prices for our mutual constituents as we are and understand our dismay over the length of time it has taken your DEP to formally submit this request to EPA,” the senators wrote.

“The roughly 2.5 million residents of Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland counties would certainly appreciate any and all efforts to provide relief of any more ‘pain’ at the gas pump this summer than is already being inflicted. We appreciate your consideration of this urgent request and look forward to your response.”

Act 50 of 2014 started the process for the elimination of the statutory requirements for RVP gasoline in Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland Counties during the summer months.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or on Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.