Former gang member pleads guilty to drug, gun charges |

Former gang member pleads guilty to drug, gun charges

Chuck Biedka

A former Pittsburgh gang member pleaded guilty in federal court in Pittsburgh Thursday to gun and drug charges.

Monty Grinage, 39, a former member of Lightfoot/Mendoza DTO gang, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to have cocaine and distribute five kilograms or more of the drug as well one count having a gun even though he is a felon who cannot legally have one.

U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said Grinage was a co-conspirator in one of the largest drug trafficking conspiracies in Western Pennsylvania history.

Grinage conspired with multiple people to import multiple kilograms of cocaine into this region.

Grinage would personally receive large amounts of cocaine and redistribute it by selling the drug to other co-conspirators. Grinage acknowledged that he was responsible for up to 50 kilograms – 110 pounds – of cocaine.

Grinage also pleaded guilty to having a 9mm handgun when investigators from the Drug Enforcement Agency executed a search warrant at his home in December 2017.

U.S. District Judge Mark Hornak scheduled sentencing for Dec. 14.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.