Butler detective fired amid investigation into former Butler Health System exec |

Butler detective fired amid investigation into former Butler Health System exec

A detective with the Butler County District Attorney’s office was fired this month amid a federal investigation involving the detective and his wife, according to District Attorney Rich Goldinger.

Scott Roskovski had worked in the office for about 20 years, Goldinger said Monday.

Roskovski had been off on leave since April 1.

The firing came after a meeting this month with an Internal Revenue Service investigator and a United States Postal Service inspector, Goldinger said.

“Based on information they had given me … I thought that it was appropriate that I end his employment with the county,” he said.

Goldinger would not elaborate on the investigation.

Roskovski made about $60,000. His wife, Stephanie, was chief operating officer at Butler Health System, Goldinger said.

Officials at Butler Health System said they have turned information about possible fraud over to state and federal investigators. A spokeswoman with the U.S. Attorney’s office in Pittsburgh declined to comment.

“In mid-2017, Butler Health System discovered evidence of a fraud committed by a single individual against the hospital,” a spokeswoman said in an emailed statement. “The evidence suggested the hospital’s former COO had been misappropriating administrative funds.”

The statement did not identify Stephanie Roskovski as the former COO. She was named COO in 2012, according to a news release at the time. She began working at Butler Memorial Hospital in 1994 and joined the administrative team in 2002, the release stated.

The alleged fraud didn’t involve patient cash, insurance co-pays or accounts, medical building, insurance fraud or the health system’s foundation, according to the health system statement. Several new officials have been appointed and financial safeguards improved.

Phone numbers listed for Scott and Stephanie Roskovski were not in service.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.