Archive

ShareThis Page
Uniontown gym trainer charged with 2010 statutory sexual assault | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Uniontown gym trainer charged with 2010 statutory sexual assault

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, December 12, 2018 2:57 p.m
534091WilliamKBosley
William K. Bosley

A Uniontown man is charged by state police with having sex with a 15-year-old girl multiple times in 2010.

State troopers charged William K. Bosley Jr., 49, with eight counts each of statutory sexual assault, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a person younger than 16, unlawful sexual contact with a minor and corruption of minors, along with seven counts of criminal use of a communication device.

Police said Bosley was a trainer at the Uniontown Fight Club when he allegedly began making sexual advances via text message to a 15-year-old girl he was training.

The woman, now 23, filed a report with police Dec 10.

She told police that shortly after joining the gym, Bosley began texting her sexual innuendos. Within a month, she and Bosley began having intercourse in Bosley’s car as well as at the fight club, according to the criminal complaint,

The woman told police Bosley requested sexual favors in exchange for additional training or for placing her on a list to fight, and also sent her a sexually explicit video of himself.

State police said the woman came forward after Bosley was arrested Dec. 6 in a similar, but separate case, according to Trib news partners WPXI.

Bosley was arrested Dec. 11, and was taken to the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $100,000 bond. He has a Dec. 19 preliminary hearing before Uniontown District Judge Michael Metros.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.