84 Lumber owner Maggie Hardy Magerko files for divorce in Westmoreland |

84 Lumber owner Maggie Hardy Magerko files for divorce in Westmoreland

Rich Cholodofsky
Maggie Hardy Magerko

Maggie Hardy Magerko, owner of Washington County-based 84 Lumber and the posh Nemacolin Woodlands Resort in Fayette County, on Thursday filed documents to end her 25-year marriage.

Magerko, 52, of Rostraver filed divorce papers in Westmoreland County, stating she lives apart from husband, Peter J. Magerko, whom she married in 1992.

Peter Magerko, 52, is listed as having a home in Smock, Fayette County. He served in the Marine Corps and is a former member of the Pennsylvania State Police, according to the 84 Lumber company website.

They have one adult son.

The brief court filing indicated only that the “marriage is irretrievably broken.”

Hardy Magerko is listed by Forbes Magazine as worth $1.3 billion and ranks as No. 484 among the wealthiest people in the United States.

At age 27, she took over as president of 84 Lumber in 1992 from her father, Joseph A. Hardy III, who founded the company. In 2000, she took over the leadership of Nemacolin Woodlands from her father, who purchased the resort at auction in 1987.

In February, Hardy Magerko made news when her company paid an estimated $15 million to air a 90-second commercial just before halftime of the Super Bowl. The controversial ad that depicted a Mexican woman and her daughter traveling to the U.S. border. Fox, the television network that broadcast the game, refused to air a portion of the ad that depicted a high border wall where they found what appeared to be a newly built wall.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.