Archive

ShareThis Page
Butler woman charged with stealing, leaking patient information from UPMC, AHN | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Butler woman charged with stealing, leaking patient information from UPMC, AHN

ptrwebgavel

A federal grand jury in Pittsburgh on Thursday indicted a Butler woman on charges of wrongfully obtaining and disclosing patients’ health information, according to the office of U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady.

Linda Sue Kalina, 61, was a patient information coordinator, first at UPMC, then for the Allegheny Health Network.

From March 2016 through August 2017, Kalina “wrongfully obtained” health information for 111 patients in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, aka HIPAA, which protects patient privacy, according to a Friday statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

On four occasions, she “wrongfully disclosed” health information on three patients with “the intent to cause malicious harm,” the attorney’s office said.

Further details were not immediately available.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Bloch is prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.

The charges are the result of an FBI investigation.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected], 724-836-6646 or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.