Impact fee funds $2.4 million in projects in Allegheny, Westmoreland counties |

Impact fee funds $2.4 million in projects in Allegheny, Westmoreland counties

Stephen Huba
The Poseidon well pad in Penn Township.The Poseidon well pad in Penn Township.

Natural gas continues to pay off for Pennsylvania and local communities.

The latest round of grants from the state’s natural gas impact fee will help fund projects in Western Pennsylvania involving flood mitigation, abandoned mine treatment, park development and watershed protection, Gov. Tom Wolf said.

The Wolf administration announced 123 projects, totaling $16.2 million, across the state receiving impact fee funding.

In Allegheny and Westmoreland counties, the Commonwealth Financing Authority this week approved projects totaling $2.4 million — $1.8 million for Allegheny County and $554,786 for Westmoreland County.

The impact fee is the annual fee that the state applies to each new unconventional well drilled into the Marcellus Shale. Some of the money is distributed directly to counties to offset the costs of increased drilling activity. Some is made available to individual communities in the form of grants.

Act 13 of 2012 stipulates that a portion of the fee revenue be transferred to the CFA for initiatives such as abandoned mine drainage abatement, abandoned well plugging, sewage treatment, greenways, trails and recreation, baseline water quality data, watershed restoration and flood control.

The fee schedule is based on the average annual price of natural gas on the New York Mercantile Exchange — a price that averaged more than $3 per million British thermal units in 2017.

This year’s projects around Southwestern Pennsylvania include:



  • Clean Streams Foundation Inc. — Ohiopyle Water Treatment, $500,000



  • Jeannette — City of Jeannette and Penn Borough Flood Mitigation Project, $418,000
  • Mt. Pleasant Township — North Diamond Street Culvert Replacement Project, $136,786



  • McKees Rocks Community Development Corp. — Sto-Rox Community Activities Field Project, $100,000
  • Oakmont — Plum Creek Trail System Phases 2 and 3 Site Remediation, $150,000
  • Chalfant — Municipal Park Rehabilitation, $75,000
  • Port Vue — New PVAA Recreation Building, $125,000
  • Rankin — Rankin Ball Field Phase I, $35,000
  • McCormack Baron Salazar Inc. — Green Plaza at New Street & Wiley Avenue, $237,000
  • Western Pennsylvania Conservancy — South 21st Street Complete Street Greenway Project, $150,000
  • Bellevue — Borough Memorial Park Project, $225,000
  • North Versailles — West Wilmerding Memorial Park ADA Restrooms, $25,000
  • Carnegie Library of Homestead — Pool and Locker Room Renovations Project, $75,000
  • Liberty — Liberty Park Tot Lot Development, $25,000
  • Springdale — Trail and Kayak Launch Development, $206,661
  • Squirrel Hill Urban Coalition — O’Connor’s Corner Parklet, $75,000
  • Dravosburg — Kidsville Improvements Phase 2, $25,000
  • North Braddock — Playground Renovation Project, $25,000
  • Clairton — Community Park Trail Project, $25,000
  • East Deer — Memorial Park Improvements, $79,942
  • Wilkins — Township Amphitheater Project, $25,000
  • Plum — Renton Park Improvements, $75,000



  • Coraopolis Water and Sewer Authority — Act 537 Plan Special Study (2018 Application), $17,851



  • Oakmont — Plum Creek Bank Rehabilitation and Gravel Bar Removal, $90,312

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.