Man in Washington County allegedly threatens to open fire on polling place |

Man in Washington County allegedly threatens to open fire on polling place

Christopher Queen
South Franklin Volunteer Fire Department in Washington County

A man in Washington County allegedly threatened to “shoot up” a polling place when poll workers informed him Tuesday morning that he was not registered in the county, according to charges filed against him.

Christopher Queen, 48, who lives in Elk County near Kane, is charged with making terroristic threats and disorderly conduct, court records show.

Queen allegedly went to the South Franklin fire hall about 8:10 a.m. and attempted to vote, according to the criminal complaint. Poll workers told him he was not registered to vote in the area, and he allegedly became angry and said he was going to come back with a gun and “shoot up” the polling place, police wrote in the complaint.

According to the complaint, Queen left but was later found and arrested.

Poll workers told Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV that Queen told them he’d been promised a gun and money if he voted “straight party.”

Voter registration records list a Christopher Queen with a birth date of Oct. 8, 1970, as a Republican registered at an address on Route 66 near Kane. Court records for the charges filed Tuesday by state police match voter registration data.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.