Petition aims to remedy tariffs on newsprint imported from Canada |

Petition aims to remedy tariffs on newsprint imported from Canada

Patrick Varine
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
Lance Budway adds a bundle of newspapers to a pallet at the Tribune-Review Falcon printing facility on Saturday, June 9, 2018 in West Deer Township.

A coalition of publishing companies, newspapers and industry groups and associations are circulating a petition to address tariffs imposed on Canadian newsprint that have caused its price to rise more than 30 percent in the U.S.

The U.S. Commerce Department imposed the tariffs — taxes on imported goods — in January and increased them in March in response to a complaint from NORPAC, a hedge fund-owned paper mill in Longview, Wash., that employs about 300 people. The mill, owned by New York-based One Rock Capital Partners, claimed it was being harmed by subsidized newsprint from Canada.

About 60 to 75 percent of U.S. newsprint comes from Canada, which claimed an ever-larger portion of the U.S. market over the last two decades as U.S. plants closed when newsprint demand declined.

The Tribune-Review has reduced page counts in its free weekly publications, eliminated some pages from its Sunday edition and implemented small increases in its single-copy prices to try and make up for the increased cost, but president and CEO Jenn Bertetto said earlier this month that an additional increase of $22.50 per metric ton would be coming in July.

The petition asks citizens to lend their support to a letter written to Rhonda Schmidtlein, chair for the International Trade Commission in Washington, D.C.

“Beyond specific direct and indirect job losses, the closure of local newspapers damages the fabric of America more broadly,” the letter reads. “A free press and informed citizens at the local level are at the foundation of democracy. In many towns and rural communities, the local newspaper is the chief source of information that affects daily life for citizens, and keeps the community connected with one another.”

The tariffs, the letter argues, show that NORPAC is “clearly seeking specialized protection for itself at a very high cost – the destruction of tens of thousands of jobs in the printing and publishing industries, and the closure of local newspapers that are the glue of communities and central to local self-governance in every corner of America.”

For more, or to sign the petition, see the website.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.