Plans to close Bruce Mansfield plant a blow to employees, Beaver County economy |

Plans to close Bruce Mansfield plant a blow to employees, Beaver County economy

Bob Bauder
Tom Fontaine | Tribune-Review
The Bruce Mansfield Plant in Shippingport, Beaver County
The Bruce Mansfield Plant in Shippingport, Beaver County, pictured Friday, Aug. 7, 2015, is FirstEnergy’s largest coal-fired power plant.
One of the three turbines at the Bruce Mansfield Power Station in Shippingport. Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review

Beaver County stands to lose a sizable chunk of its tax base in addition to more than 250 good-paying industrial jobs should bankrupt FirstEnergy Solutions close its Bruce Mansfield power plant in 2021 as announced on Wednesday, county officials said.

County Commissioners Chairman Dan Camp said FirstEnergy, which owns the coal-fired Bruce Mansfield plant and the Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station, both in Shippingport, is the county’s largest taxpayer with property assessed at $135 million.

Its annual tax bill totals about $1.8 million for a county that has struggled financially in recent years and levied a 17 percent tax increase in 2017 to balance its $75 million operating budget.

“It’s a trickle down effect,” Camp said. “It’s not only affecting the workers, but it’s going to impact all of Beaver County.”

South Side Area School District and Shippingport would also lose significant tax revenue.

FirstEnergy Solutions, a subsidiary of Akron-based FirstEnergy Corp., cited “market challenges” in March when it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and announced it intended to close all of its coal-fired and nuclear plants. Bruce Mansfield is set to close on June 1, 2021. The company has yet to announce a closing date for the nuclear plant, which employs around 800, but said it would take about three years.

Bruce Mansfield has been generating power since 1976 when the first of its three units went online.

Shippingport was home to the nation’s first commercial nuclear power plant, the Shippingport Atomic Power Station, which went online in 1957. That plant, owned and built by Duquesne Light Co., operated until 1982 and has since been dismantled. Its successors — the Beaver Valley Unit 1 and Unit 2 reactors — are owned by FirstEnergy and have been running since 1976 and 1987, respectively.

County officials lamented that the closing of the plants would be a major setback for a county celebrating its first significant economic development — Shell Chemical’s $6 billion ethane cracker plant under construction in Potter Township — since the collapse of the steel industry in the 1980s.

“We’re making all this economic progress and then you take a step backward potentially in 2021,” said Jack Manning, president and executive director of the Beaver County Chamber of Commerce. “It certainly negates a lot of the positive gains we’ve been having here in Beaver County.

“Those are good family-sustaining wages, and the lack of that disposable income is going to impact some of the businesses as well as the taxes for all of the places that collect them.”

FirstEnergy has sought intervention from the Department of Energy to keep its plants open, and Bruce Mansfield workers are counting on government to stop the closure, according to Victor Roppa, president of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 272. He said the union has yet to receive word from the company on the fate of its employees.

FirstEnergy Solutions employees about 250 union and management workers at the plant, according to a company spokesman. About 200 of those are union members.

In addition to Bruce Mansfield, the company announced the closings of three plants in Ohio. The combined workforce of the four plants is about 550.

“If they do shut the plant down, of course, there’s going to be a job reduction or elimination,” Roppa said. “We’re still hoping the government realizes the importance of reliable power and does something to help us out.”

If that happens, FirstEnergy could reverse course, according to a company statement.

“The federal government is currently considering policy measures that would support fossil and nuclear generating facilities considered at risk in the current market environment, but vital to grid security and reliability,” it said. “Depending on the timing of any federal policy action, deactivation decisions could be reversed or postponed.”

Roppa said he hopes the federal government realizes the critical role Bruce Mansfield plays in supplying power to the region’s electrical grid.

“We’re going to still be here and run as usual until they restructure, and there’s no answers yet on what’s going to happen,” he said. “We have a highly skilled, proud workforce down here, and we want to keep providing dependable power for the community.”

The other plants set to close are Eastlake 6 in Eastlake, Ohio; W.H. Sammis Diesel in Stratton, Ohio; and W.H. Sammis Units 5-7, also in Stratton.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.