U.N. report says 90 percent of plastic never recycled |

U.N. report says 90 percent of plastic never recycled

Patrick Varine
In this photo taken Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2018, a man walks on a mountain of plastic bottles as he carries a sack of them to be sold for recycling after weighing them at the dump in the Dandora slum of Nairobi, Kenya. As the world meets again to tackle the growing threat of climate change, how the continent tackles the growing solid waste produced by its more than 1.2 billion residents, many of them eager consumers in growing economies, is a major question in the fight against climate change.

Either don’t use plastic bags or be far more cautious about how you dispose of them.

That’s the upshot from a United Nations’ report out this year on the future of plastics recycling and, indeed, the future of recycling itself.

The 2018 report, “ Single-Use Plastics: A Roadmap for Sustainability ,” paints a bleak picture of the future for curbside recycling in the U.S. if steps can’t be taken to remove plastic bags from the curbside recycling stream. And the current track record for plastics recycling highlighted in the report is even worse: according to the report, 90.5 percent of the plastic waste generated in the world has not been recycled.

That percentage was dubbed the “International Statistic of the Year” by the London-based Royal Statistical Society.

Just one example from the U.N. report: Each year consumers world-wide use an estimated 5 trillion plastic bags. That’s a rate of about 10 million per minute. If all of those bags were tied together, a single year’s worth would wrap around the Earth seven times.

In real-world terms, that 90.5 percent statistic adds up to about 6.3 trillion metric tons of plastic that has either been incinerated or dumped into a landfill somewhere in the world.

“It’s very concerning that such a large proportion of plastic waste has never been recycled,” said RSS President Sir David Spiegelhalter, who chaired the Stats of the Year judging panel. “This statistic helps to show the scale of the challenge we all face.”

Plastic bags, in particular, pose a challenge both in terms of reducing their overall use as well as reducing their impact on recyclers and the environment.

Waste Management Spokeswoman Erika DeYarmin-Young said plastic bags are the top source of contamination for the company.

It isn’t that the bags aren’t recyclable; they are. But they require a different collection system and different processing equipment than most curbside recyclers use. As a result, Waste Management workers spend massive amounts of time untangling the bags from their recycling sorters.

“We are really trying to move away from the (recycling) numbers (printed on plastics), which are the resin codes, to looking at the shape of plastic containers,” DeYarmin-Young said. “Recycling plastic bottles, jugs and jars are the direction we ask customers to follow when deciding what to put in their recycling bins.”

The shift in many communities to single-stream recycling has exacerbated problems for plastics recyclers, and the convenience of tossing all recyclables into one container has come at a great cost, according to Justin Stockdale, regional director for the Pennsylvania Resources Council.

“A mixed pile of rubbish is impossible to unscramble and commodities markets that consume the old newspapers and plastic bottles have been pushed to the brink,” Stockdale said when discussing the current state of recycling in Pennsylvania.

2018 marked the 30th anniversary of Act 101, the state’s landmark recycling law, but, instead of celebrating something that has gone from the cultural fringe to deeply embedded cultural behavior, there is concern about the very future of recycling.

Stockdale said he thinks both attitudes and methods of recycling in the U.S. will have to change to be successful.

“Single-stream recycling attracts contamination by its very nature,” Stockdale said. “I think we will see a shift back to a hybrid system where there will be some curbside drop-off and other things will go to a recycling center.”

Erik Solheim, who heads U.N. Environment, put it concisely in his foreword for the U.N.’s single-use plastics report.

“Plastic isn’t the problem,” he wrote. “It’s what we do with it. And that means the onus is on us to be far smarter in how we use this miracle material.”

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.