Archive

ShareThis Page
Michelle Denk to replace William Cornman on Sewickley council | TribLIVE.com
Sewickley

Michelle Denk to replace William Cornman on Sewickley council

223739sewsewickleyborough090618
The Sewickley Borough Building.

Sewickley resident Michelle Denk was appointed Sept. 11 to the Ward 3 council seat that opened up in August when William Cornman resigned.

“I love our town, and I believe it is very precious and rare,” Denk said.

In her application for the position, Denk highlighted her 20 years of business experience in strategic change consulting, as well as her achievements while attending Sewickley Academy.

Denk served as senior class president while at Sewickley Academy and earned the honor of valedictorian. She also has an master’s of business administration degree from the University of Chicago, which she earned in 2001. She has worked in strategic sales at Dietz & Watson since 2013, she said.

She recently served on the Shade Tree Commission, according to her application.

She looks forward to serving the citizens of Sewickley and mentioned her desire to help create a long-term vision for the community in an interview with the Sewickley Herald after the meeting.

Council also appointed Cynthia Mullins to replace Cornman as borough council’s representative on the Shade Tree Commission. Dave Parker was also appointed to a vacancy on the Shade Tree Commission. He will serve out a term that expires on Dec. 31, 2019.

Denk’s term as a councilwoman will also end in December 2019. Council voted 5-3 for her appointment at the meeting, choosing her over two other candidates — Jere Cowden and Thomas Rostek.

“You are a stellar candidate as well, I wish we had two positions available,” council President Jeff Neff told Rostek, the only other candidate in attendance.

Sam Bojarski is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.