Masonic Village villas plan moves forward in Aleppo |

Masonic Village villas plan moves forward in Aleppo

Masonic Village’s plan to build 10 new villas on its Aleppo site moved forward with conditional approval from township commissioners.

“We have a growing wait list for villas and we are planning to meet the demand of individuals who want to be part of our campus and its amenities and want the peace of mind of having available health care in the future if they ever need it,” Masonic Villages spokeswoman Debra Davis said in an email. The nonprofit group is the charitable arm of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania. The Lancaster County-based nonprofit operates five retirement communities across Pennsylvania.

More than 500 people currently reside in the senior-citizen community in Aleppo.

“We received conditional use approval and are anticipating final plan approval in the next month,” Davis said.

At its June 18 meeting, the township commission unanimously approved three motions all related to Masonic Villages application to build the villas.

Matthew Doebler, president of Aleppo commissioners, described the villas as five separate buildings with a total of 10 dwelling units.

Masonic Village in Aleppo includes 228 retirement living apartments, 43 retirement living villas and 60 personal care residences.

“They meet the requirements,” Doebler said.

Earlier this year, Masonic Villages withdrew its request to build a children’s home on the 60-acre site after nearby township residents said the project would disrupt the residential neighborhood and lower property values. Residents also questioned the potential impact of additional staff parking and the number of buses that would be going back and forth from the children’s home.

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at [email protected], 412-627-9423, or via Twitter at @41Suzanne.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.