Archive

Quaker Valley Joint Schools Board approved building additions 60 years ago this week | TribLIVE.com
Sewickley

Quaker Valley Joint Schools Board approved building additions 60 years ago this week

492466sewrememberwhenlogo

In the news this week 60 years ago:

• The Quaker Valley Joint Schools Board approved a plan for additions to both the junior and senior high school buildings. The board awaited state approval of their plan before architects could begin preparing blueprints for the construction bidding process.

• An organizational meeting for a potential Sewickley chapter of the NAACP was scheduled for next week at St. Matthew AME Zion Church at Thorn and Walnut Streets. Rev. Dr. Charles R. Gordon, minister at St. Matthew, said he hoped that an active Sewickley NAACP chapter would become part of a larger Beaver Valley NAACP association and that this goal would be reached in 1959, the NAACP’s 50th anniversary year.

• Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pa., received more than $25,000 from a bequest of the late Fanny M. Dravo of Sewickley Heights. This final disbursement of Mrs. Dravo’s estate brought her total bequest to over $281,000. These funds joined those of three other Dravo family members to total $1.4 million in endowment funds established at the university. Ralph Dravo and his brother, Francis, both graduated from Lehigh in the 1880s prior to founding of what became the Dravo Corporation, a successful shipbuilding company.

• Sewickley Academy planned a weeklong series of Christmas programs for the week of Dec. 19. Activities included Christmas plays and skits presented by the primary grades. The final programs were to be a choral concert and a production of Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol” presented by the upper grades.

Melanie Linn Gutowski is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.