Archive

Remember When: In 1905, Sewickley Herald reported on nude river bathers | TribLIVE.com
Sewickley

Remember When: In 1905, Sewickley Herald reported on nude river bathers

sewRememberWhen062818
Sewickley Herald archives
1905

This week, we take a look back at what was making news in the Sewickley Herald 113 years ago this week:

• On the impending Independence Day holiday: “On Tuesday next, Uncle Sam will be one hundred and twenty-nine years old. Rather old for an uncle, but quite young for a Republic.”

• Edgeworth defeated Edgewood in the last round of the Western Pennsylvania Golf Association’s spring matches at the Edgeworth Golf Links (now the Edgeworth Club). The score was 9 to 2.

• Mrs. Henry Buhl Jr. held a luncheon for the wife of Philander C. Knox at her home, “Cloverton Hills,” in Sewickley Heights. Knox, formerly U.S. Attorney General, was currently serving as a U.S. senator for Pennsylvania. His wife was staying in the Heights as a guest of Mrs. George Harton Singer. It was unclear whether Mrs. Knox’s husband had accompanied her.

• A second volunteer fire company was founded in Leetsdale by Thomas Shields and Mike Ryan. The two founders gave a demonstration of a new fire extinguisher by staging a blaze at the ruins of the town’s old hotel.

• Leetsdale reminded the public of its new ordinance “prohibiting the sale and use of torpedo canes, dynamite crackers and toy pistols within the borough limits” in the lead-up to the Fourth of July.

• The Herald also reminded “the boys who persist in bathing in the Ohio River without swimming tights” that they will be reported to Chief Morningstar if they do not stop.

Find the entire Herald archive — dating from the first edition of Sept. 19, 1903 — on the Sewickley Public Library’s digital research archives at sewickleylibrary.org.

Melanie Linn Gutowski is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.