3 seek vacant Brentwood Council spot |
South Hills

3 seek vacant Brentwood Council spot

Three people – including a former councilman – have submitted applications to fill the Brentwood Council vacancy.

Applicants for the position include Rich Schubert, who served on council for a number of years and opted last year to not run for re-election last year. Other applicants include Scott Phares, owner of Misty Waters gift shop on Brownsville Road, and Mary Vetere, who previously ran for a seat on council.

The open seat became available last month when Stephanie Fox resigned. Council has until July 1 to fill the vacancy. She had been a member of Brentwood Borough Council since January 2014.

Schubert, a member of council for six years, said he got busy with family life, but that his wife gave him the green light to pursue the vacancy.

“There will be a short learning curve to get back to speed,” Schubert said at the June 18 council meeting. “But, I believe in being involved.”

Phares, a former mortgage closer, said he moved to Brentwood 10 years ago because he was looking for a place to call home. He said he had been thinking about running for council for years.

“I plan on being visible and accessible,” Phares told council. “All I want to do is be a voice for residents and business owners.

“I didn’t come here lightly. I have been thinking about this for the past few years.”

Vetere was not present at the June 18 meeting. But in a June 12, social media post Vetere announced her plans to pursue the opening.

“My love and desire to help the community is strong and I will continue to pursue it,” Vetere wrote.

It is expected that council will name a replacement for Fox at its June 25 meeting.

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at [email protected], 412-627-9423, or Twitter @41Suzanne.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.