ShareThis Page
Jefferson Hills Council splits $70K grant among 3 fire companies |
South Hills

Jefferson Hills Council splits $70K grant among 3 fire companies

| Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:03 p.m
Members of the Boca Chica Fire Department stand in front of their new fire truck, a 1984 engine that was donated by the Gill Hall Volunteer Fire Department in Jefferson Hills.
Members of the Boca Chica Fire Department stand in front of their new fire truck, a 1984 engine that was donated by the Gill Hall Volunteer Fire Department in Jefferson Hills.
Stephanie Hacke | for the Tribune-Review
A 'Save Floreffe Fire Hall' sign in the front yard of a home on West Bruceton Road in Pleasant Hills on Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2017.

After delaying a decision for one month, Jefferson Hills Council voted Monday to allot equal shares of money to the three volunteer fire companies serving the borough.

The money comes from the Pennsylvania Foreign Fire Insurance allotment, distributed to municipalities. Jefferson Hills’ share is $70,044.

Council approved splitting the money evenly in a 5-1 vote, with member Tracey Khalil opposed. Council member James Weber was absent.

Khalil initially asked for 45 percent each to go to the Gill Hall and Jefferson Hills 885 volunteer fire companies, and the remaining 10 percent to Floreffe Volunteer Fire Company.

Khalil said last month that Floreffe’s members have not completed as much training or responded to as many calls as Gill Hall and Jefferson Hills 885. Khalil also said part of the reason is that Floreffe has fewer members than the other two companies.

“They really suffer with membership and have a hard time with recruiting,” Khalil said.

But Debbie Cudlipp, recording secretary for the Floreffe Volunteer Fire Company, disputed the notion the company’s members get less training. Cudlipp said many of the Floreffe members simply don’t train with Gill Hall and Jefferson Hills 885 because of other commitments.

“I’ve taken training outside the department, with other departments,” Cudlipp said. “I am still a first-responder whether I get my training through Allegheny County or Jefferson.”

Council member Vickie Ielase said Floreffe’s leadership manages the company’s budget well and does not request additional funds from the borough. Ielase also noted the borough traditionally has split the money evenly.

Council member Francis Sockman said until specific criteria is spelled out for distribution of funds, the shares should remain equal.

Khalil plans to write provisions such as training, communication with the borough and reporting finances to council as requirements for the money in the future.

Eric Eisert is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.