ShareThis Page
Primary: Pleasant Hills district judge; Baldwin, Whitehall municipal results |
South Hills

Primary: Pleasant Hills district judge; Baldwin, Whitehall municipal results

The race for the vacant magisterial district justice office in Pleasant Hills (05-02-16) that serves Jefferson Hills, Pleasant Hills and South Park has been decided in the primary.

Candidate Michael W. Thatcher of Jefferson Hills captured both the Democratic and Republican nominations, according to unofficial results from Allegheny County.

Six candidates sought the Democratic nomination while only four of the candidates cross-filed to be on the Republican ballot.

Thatcher, 33, works as a project manager for his family business, Thatcher Realty LLC, and as a realtor for All Pittsburgh Real Estate. He also is a firefighter for the Pleasant Hills and Gill Hall volunteer fire companies. He also is a major in the Reserve of the Marine Corps.

Thatcher easily captured the Republican nomination with 859 votes. Andy Codelka was second on the Republican slate with 567 votes. Codelka also finished second to Thatcher on the Democratic side.

The seat was previously held by state Sen. Guy Reschenthaler.

Magisterial district judge 05-02-16

Jefferson Hills, Pleasant Hills and South Park

Democrat (vote for one)

Michael Thatcher: 867

Andy Codelka: 574

John Puskar: 439

D. Scott Lautner: 296

Cynthia O’Donnell: 186

Howard Murphy: 97

Republican (vote for one)

Michael Thatcher: 1,059

Andy Codelka: 394

D. Scott Lautner: 214

John Puskar: 73

Baldwin Borough

Five candidates challenged for four Democratic nominations for Baldwin Council.

The Democratic ticket was led by Marianne Conley and incumbent Francis Scott. Chad Hurka and E. John Egger rounded out the Democratic nominations.

No candidates were on the Republican ballot for the primary.

Democrat (vote for four)

Marianne Conley: 1,166

Francis Scott: 1,072

Chad Hurka: 933

E. John Egger: 858

Robert Ieraci: 853

Whitehall Council

Five Republicans challenged for four party nominations in the Whitehall Council race.

Incumbents William Veith and Linda Book were the top vote-getters on the Republican side, along with challengers Chris Mooney and Theodore Mueskes Jr. They will face off against Democrats Kathy DePuy, Thomas Gregory Kelley, Alexa Mihalko and John Wotus, who were uncontested.

Republican (vote for four)

William Veith: 456

Linda Book: 444

Chris Mooney: 310

Theodore Mueskes Jr.: 296

Harold Plusa: 274

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5805, or via Twitter @TribJimSpez.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.