ShareThis Page
Leetsdale won’t pay VFW for parking |
South Hills

Leetsdale won’t pay VFW for parking

| Wednesday, June 20, 2018 5:51 p.m
Kristina Serafini | Tribune-Review
Kennedy Waffensmith, 7, of Aleppo runs through a water feature at the Leetsdale splash pad in Henle Park on Friday, June 17, 2016.

Citing that there is plenty of free parking around the Leetsdale Splash Pad, borough council refused a request from VFW Post 3372 for $3,000 to pay for 30 parking places in its lot during the months of June, July and August.

“Plain and simple, it’s too much money,” said Tom Belcastro, council president after the June 14 council meeting. “Ninety percent of the people who use the splash pad walk.”

The Leetsdale Splash was opened in 2009 and was largely paid for with grant monies. Since grant money was used to construct the water feature, no admission is charged by the borough. But because of high water bills, the water feature is open Thursday through Sunday from noon until 6 p.m.

The VFW post sits next to the splash pad in Henle Park. As a result, many of the splash pad users — some of whom don’t live in Leetsdale — park in the VFW lot.

Like many VFW posts in Western Pennsylvania and across the country, the Leetsdale post is faced with a declining and aging membership. It relies on its canteen to stay financially solvent, which is not a problem during the colder months. The post said the $3,000 from the borough would keep it financially sound.

Tom James, the post’s quartermaster, said in an email a couple of days before the June 14 meeting that the lot would be closed if the borough did not make a reasonable offer. James, who could not be reached for further comment, said the closure would affect the borough’s July 4th celebration and any concerts held in Henle Park.

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at, 412-627-9423, or Twitter @41 Suzanne

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.