ShareThis Page
Brentwood planning bond issue for projects |
South Hills

Brentwood planning bond issue for projects

| Tuesday, June 19, 2018 3:54 p.m

Brentwood Council is proceeding with plans to issue municipal bonds totaling $7 million with monies earmarked toward financing a new borough building and paying for necessary renovations at the community’s swimming pool.

The bond issue will be voted on at council’s July 23 meeting, borough Manager George Zboyovsky said.

“Council is having the debt ordinance drafted to reflect a $7 million bond with a 26-year wrap around,” Zboyovsky said.

A new municipal building has been in the planning stages for a year and will be constructed at the former Snee Dairy site on Brownsville Road, which was purchased by Brentwood earlier this year. It is estimated that a new building will cost approximately $6 million to build. It will replace the existing structure which is 100 years old.

Brentwood, meanwhile, loses around $60,000 a year on its community pool, which dates back to the 1960s and is in need of extensive repairs. Repairs are estimated to cost anywhere from $2.5 million to $3 million to make. A third option would be to transform the pool into green space, which is estimated to cost $1.25 million.

Zboyovsky said the community appears to be in favor of making the pool repairs. The future of the Brentwood pool will be the topic of a community meeting hosted by council on June 27.

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at, 412-627-9423, or via Twitter at @41Suzanne.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.