Archive

$780k contract is the first for Freeport’s sewage plant rebuild | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

$780k contract is the first for Freeport’s sewage plant rebuild

WEBconstructionahead

Freeport’s sewage plant rebuild took a major step forward with the first contract awarded.

Jet Jack Inc. of Oakdale was awarded a nearly $780,000 contract for piping and infrastructure work.

The bid is subject to review by Solicitor Gerald DeAngelis and Bryan Churilla of KLH engineering.

Work at the plant along Buffalo Creek will begin after Labor Day, when the boat launch is closed.

Much of the construction will take place during the winter months, with the work scheduled to be done in March, depending on the severity of winter weather.

Other bidders for the contract were Glenn Johnston Inc. of McKeesport; Bison Construction of Fairmont City; Kukurin Construction of Export; and Terra Works Inc. of Clarion.

The work includes installing 1,650 feet of 10-inch to 27-inch pipe as well as 14 manholes to help decrease overflows.

Ultimately, the plant will be rebuilt as part of an $11.6 million project in 2022 to serve its 850 customers.

Residents will see a $55 to $58 monthly increase in their bills, depending upon how much of the work can be done with a combination of grants and loans.

Council on Monday also approved a sewage holding tank as part of the XTO natural gas well drilling project in the upper portion of the borough.

The holding tank won’t exactly involve sewage, according to officials. Instead, it will service showers and other conveniences for drillers who will be working around the clock.

Butler County is expected to issue a permit for the project and provide a sewage enforcement officer for the site.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.